The Unreachable Church

I see sin as misplacing. Now you may call it sin if you are a committed Christian otherwise it’s the name I give to everything that’s un-comfortable for the human being in different instances of his/her life.

There was always in the human history a quest for putting things “right” , in their places. The need for square, simple things is not a sign of weakness or God forbid, idiocy, but a sign of a healthy constitution.

Then if you want to find “normality” you look for (en)closures – the square, the box, the borders, the systems, the synthesis, the laws all come in handy. Almost inevitable, the laws of nature (again?) are pushing them through.

Freedom on the other hand has always been seen as ambiguous at best, two-sided option or even evil. At any rate it is mainly seen as opposing the rules, the square, the closing in. The Christian story of the falling angel who ended up the enemy of God tells us about his temptation to get out of the “square box” that being God’s servant forever and ever was and to try to be more than he was meant to be.

No surprises then if Christian high ranks for centuries saw the freedom of spirit as a danger to the believer and ultimately to the Church. That this freedom would have endangered their own  comfortable privileges is another story.

This “later days” we are living in, the danger comes more and more from the growing sense of freedom not against Church’s rules and practices, and doctrines but outside them. As they say, the opposite of love is indifference not hate.

In this respect, from the Church’s point of view, being an agnostic or even atheist should be a more desirable place for a person than being entirely secular, hedonistic-oriented one.

The reality is somewhat different. The Church sees too often the opponents as enemies and tries hard to find friends among the fools. For the religious people the new forbidden fruit is the (yet) unreachable

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to The Unreachable Church

  1. Camix says:

    It’s probably something we were born with. an experiment has been made with fish in a bowl. when night came, fish would gather in the middle of the bowl, unable to move around. after a few days, some lights were put in the bowl to show its borders and the fish immediately felt secure and began moving around.

    Maybe we do need some borders, because of our earthly nature,but still need to learn God’s freedom to discover His and its beauty?

    • sam says:

      You’re right about the need for borders for security reasons, us being human and all.
      I am more aware of how slow in reactions is the officialdom in Church to the increasing “so what” attitutde towards anything that’s a spiritual not only religious matter.
      Theologians, preachers and priests alike seem more concerned with responding (or defending faith as they like to call it) to accusations and questionings from the atheists and agnostics circles. In the sense that they are much more interested in defending by offending rather then including. But that’s not news perhaps.
      Meanwhile the crowd in the fifth column aka the uninterested is increasing at high speed.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s